Are non­com­pete agree­ments over? The Biden adminsitration’s Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion wants to make it so

Are noncompete agreements over? The Biden adminsitration’s Federal Trade Commission wants to make it so

The U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce met the Fed­er­al Trade Commission’s late April announce­ment that it would ban all future employ­ee non­com­pete agree­ments with a sim­ple, uncom­pro­mis­ing dec­la­ra­tion: See you in court.
“The Fed­er­al Trade Commission’s deci­sion to ban employ­er non­com­pete agree­ments across the econ­o­my is not only unlaw­ful but also a bla­tant pow­er grab that will under­mine Amer­i­can busi­ness­es’ abil­i­ty to remain com­pet­i­tive,” charged Cham­ber Pres­i­dent Suzanne P. Clark in a state­ment.
Clark promised that her orga­ni­za­tion would “sue the FTC to block this unnec­es­sary and unlaw­ful rule and put oth­er agen­cies on notice that such over­reach will not go unchecked.”
In a rare reg­u­la­to­ry move, the final FTC rule against non­com­petes went fur­ther than the orig­i­nal pro­pos­al. The agency explained that “exist­ing non­com­petes for the vast major­i­ty of work­ers will no longer be enforce­able after the rule’s effec­tive date,” about four months from now.
The agency allowed that exist­ing C‑suite non­com­petes “can remain in force.” How­ev­er, bar­ring judi­cial inter­ven­tion, once the rule takes effect, “employ­ers are banned from enter­ing into or attempt­ing to enforce any new non­com­petes, even if the …