The doc­u­men­tar­i­ans and the mur­der­er

The documentarians and the murderer

Because doc­u­men­tary films con­tend with real peo­ple and real events, it is to be expect­ed that they shape the public’s under­stand­ing of those peo­ple and events. But it is a dif­fer­ent mat­ter alto­geth­er when those films start to have a tan­gi­ble impact on the peo­ple or events they are pur­port­ing to doc­u­ment. 
What if Fahren­heit 9/11 had some­how brought about an end to the Iraq War? Or if Grey Gar­dens had led to Big Edie and Lit­tle Edie ren­o­vat­ing their dilap­i­dat­ed estate? In such hypo­thet­i­cal cas­es, would the film­mak­ers be con­sid­ered bystanders to the con­se­quences of their films or, for good or ill, par­tic­i­pants in those after­ef­fects?
Such are the ques­tions and quan­daries that must be pon­dered in watch­ing Andrew Jarecki’s long-belat­ed doc­u­men­tary minis­eries The Jinx: Part Two. Like its pre­de­ces­sor, the new series revolves around Robert Durs …