Renew­able ener­gy and pol­i­tics — can the two con­tin­ue to mix?

Renewable energy and politics — can the two continue to mix?

Texas is the largest oil pro­duc­er in the Unit­ed States. Noth­ing sur­pris­ing there, but the state is also, per­haps less well known, the largest pro­duc­er of wind ener­gy. It also comes in sec­ond as the country’s largest pro­duc­er of solar pow­er, behind only Cal­i­for­nia.
Per­haps that makes it a very good exam­ple of how ener­gy sup­ply, and the sources of such sup­ply, is pre­dom­i­nant­ly a bipar­ti­san mat­ter. A solid­ly Repub­li­can state is such a large pro­duc­er of renew­able ener­gy after all, some­thing not nec­es­sar­i­ly asso­ci­at­ed with so-called red states.
But as a high­ly polar­ized pres­i­den­tial elec­tion fast approach­es, is there a dan­ger that such exam­ples of bipar­ti­san­ship, or ener­gy source neu­tral­i­ty, may fall by the way­side? After all, Repub­li­can nom­i­nee Don­ald Trump has said he would …