The Dam­age Vic­to­ria Nuland Has Done

The Damage Victoria Nuland Has Done

For­eign Affairs

The Dam­age Vic­to­ria Nuland Has Done

The State Department’s for­mer top woman on Ukraine has been an invalu­able source on Amer­i­cans’ involve­ment in the war—particularly her own.

Cred­it: image via Shut­ter­stock

The Fifth Amend­ment, it seems, is some­thing Vic­to­ria Nuland is unaware of. The for­mer under­sec­re­tary of state for polit­i­cal affairs just keeps incrim­i­nat­ing her­self. But her statements—both inter­cept­ed and public—have done more than incrim­i­nate her­self: They have incrim­i­nat­ed the Unit­ed States. Nuland’s state­ments have act­ed as some of the most impor­tant sources for U.S. involve­ment in Ukraine from the roots of the war, the growth of the war, and the deci­sion not to cut down the war and stop it.

The war in Ukraine is a tan­gled web woven from three sep­a­rate, but relat­ed, con­flicts: the con­flict with­in Ukraine, the con­flict between Rus­sia and Ukraine, and the con­flict between NATO and Ukraine. Nuland has had a hand in all of them.

The con­flict with­in Ukraine goes back long before the war with Rus­sia, but the prox­i­mate cause is the 2014 coup that removed Vik­tor Yanukovych from pow­er and replaced him with the West­ern-lean­ing Petro Poroshenko. Nuland was a force in that coup, and her com­ments are among the most impor­tant sources of proof of U.S. involve­ment.

The “Maid­an Rev­o­lu­tion” received Amer­i­can finan­cial back­ing. The U.S.-government fund­ed Nation­al Endow­ment for Democ­ra­cy (NED) fund­ed a stag­ger­ing 65 pro-Maid­an projects inside Ukraine. Nuland revealed that there was much more U.S. mon­ey flow­ing into Ukraine than the mon­ey pro­vid­ed by the NED. In Decem­ber 2013, she told an audi­ence at the U.S.-Ukraine Foun­da­tion Con­fer­ence that the U.S. had “invest­ed over $5 bil­lion” to secure a “demo­c­ra­t­ic Ukraine.”

But Nuland did more than dis­close U.S.-financed med­dling in Ukraine. Nuland, who ran the Oba­ma State Department’s Ukraine pol­i­cy, revealed the deep involve­ment of the U.S. in the coup itself. Nuland was caught plot­ting who the Amer­i­cans want­ed to be the win­ner of the regime change. She can be heard on an inter­cept­ed call telling the Amer­i­can ambas­sador in Kiev, Geof­frey Pyatt, that Arseniy Yat­senyuk is America’s choice to replace Yanukovych. Most impor­tant­ly, Pyatt refers to the West need­ing to “mid­wife this thing,” an admis­sion of America’s …