Bye Bye Barnier! French Gov­ern­ment Col­laps­es as Le Pen Joins Left­ist Bloc to Oust Glob­al­ist PM over ‘Tech­no­crat­ic’ Bud­get

<div>Bye Bye Barnier! French Government Collapses as Le Pen Joins Leftist Bloc to Oust Globalist PM over 'Technocratic' Budget</div>

The gov­ern­ment of France has fall­en for the sec­ond time this year, as a vote of no con­fi­dence in Prime Min­is­ter Michel Barnier was passed by the Nation­al Assem­bly on Wednes­day, giv­ing the for­mer Euro­crat the igno­min­ious dis­tinc­tion of being the short­est tenured prime min­is­ter in mod­ern French his­to­ry.

Just 91 days after being installed in the Hôtel Matignon by Pres­i­dent Macron, Michel Barnier saw his gov­ern­ment col­lapse on Wednes­day, as Marine Le Pen’s pop­ulist Nation­al Ral­ly (RN) par­ty joined onto a cen­sure motion to dethrone the gov­ern­ment launched by the left-wing New Pop­u­lar Front (NFP) bloc, Le Figaro reports.

While Le Pen and her fac­tion gave Barnier’s gov­ern­ment ben­e­fit of the doubt sup­port fol­low­ing July’s snap leg­isla­tive elec­tions, in which the Nation­al Assem­bly was left in a three-way split between the left­ist NFP, the Nation­al Ral­ly, and neo-lib­er­al Macro­nists, Prime Min­is­ter Barnier’s move on Mon­day to invoke a con­sti­tu­tion­al loop­hole in an attempt to push through effec­tive cuts to social secu­ri­ty pay­ments to seniors with­out a vote in the par­lia­ment, saw Le Pen revoke her sup­port from the gov­ern­ment and announce her sup­port for the NFP’s no con­fi­dence vote.

The motion passed the Nation­al Assem­bly on Wednes­day as 331 MPs vot­ed in favour of col­laps­ing the gov­ern­ment, far sur­pass­ing the 289 need­ed to pass. It marks the first time since 1962 that a gov­ern­ment in Paris was oust­ed by par­lia­men­tary vote. Hav­ing only served 91 days in the post, for­mer Euro­crat and top Brex­it vil­lain Barnier now owns the title for the least time spent as prime min­is­ter, behind Pierre Béré­gov­oy at 362 days, Mau­rice Cou­ve de Murville at 345 days, Edith Cres­son at 322 days, for­mer Macron PM Gabriel Attal whose reign end­ed at 240 days ear­li­er this year, and Bernard Cazeneuve at 161 days.

In his final speech in front of the Nation­al Assem­bly on Wednes­day ahead of his fait accom­pli removal, Barnier said: “This is real­i­ty. I tried to con­front it by pre­sent­ing dif­fi­cult finan­cial texts. I would have pre­ferred to dis­trib­ute mon­ey, even if we don’t have any. But this real­i­ty remains there, it will not dis­ap­pear by the mag­ic of a motion of cen­sure. This real­i­ty will be remem­bered by any gov­ern­ment what­ev­er it may be.”

The col­lapse of the French gov­ern­ment, just weeks after the Ger­man coali­tion gov­ern­ment broke down, has left a pow­er vac­u­um in the heart of the EU. Going for­ward, Pres­i­dent Macron, who returned today from a trip to Sau­di Ara­bia, will have lim­it­ed options in steer­ing the French state, giv­en a con­sti­tu­tion­al pro­hi­bi­tion on him call­ing for fresh par­lia­men­tary elec­tions until mid­way through next year and his refusal to resign from the pres­i­den­cy, which would spark a nation­al elec­tion.

It is con­ceiv­able that Macron could attempt to mere­ly re-instate Barnier, how­ev­er, the bud­getary issues would remain and bar­ring sig­nif­i­cant con­ces­sions, a sec­ond Barnier pre­mier­ship would like­ly face sim­i­lar ends to the first. He could also seek a replace­ment from the so-called cen­tre-right Les Répub­li­cains par­ty from which Barnier hailed, how­ev­er, it is unclear if any capa­ble hand would be will­ing to lift up the poi­son chal­ice that the PM post has become.

Alter­na­tive­ly, Macron could seek to appoint an Ital­ian-style tech­no­crat­ic gov­ern­ment staffed with bureau­crats and “experts”, though such an option has nev­er been attempt­ed in mod­ern France. Mean­while, the NFP bloc, which claims to have won the last elec­tion despite secur­ing far few­er votes than the RN, has made noise, call­ing for Macron to form an alliance and appoint a left­ist from their ranks as the next PM. This would poten­tial­ly cause a revolt among Macron’s cen­trist allies in the par­lai­ment, how­ev­er, giv­en divides on eco­nom­ic and for­eign pol­i­cy, par­tic­u­lar­ly over the staunch anti-Israel mes­sag­ing from the likes of Jean-Luc Mélen­chon, the major far-left pow­er bro­ker behind the New Pop­u­lar Front.

Although Barnier was pitched to the pub­lic as a steady polit­i­cal oper­a­tor who could nav­i­gate the divid­ed Nation­al Assem­bly and pass through bud­getary cuts need­ed to avert the nation’s loom­ing debt cri­sis, the 73-year-old vet­er­an politi­cian was appar­ent­ly not up to the task. Stun­ning­ly, reports emerged on Tues­day that Barnier believed that Le Pen’s threat to col­lapse the gov­ern­ment over social secu­ri­ty cuts was a bluff and there­fore decid­ed to aban­don nego­ti­at­ing with the RN leader.

Appear­ing before the hemi­cy­cle at the Palais Bour­bon on Wednes­day, Le Pen said: “Here we are at the moment of truth… which puts an end to an ephemer­al gov­ern­ment… It is with­in its ranks that intran­si­gence, sec­tar­i­an­ism and dog­ma­tism pro­hib­it­ed the Prime Min­is­ter from mak­ing the slight­est con­ces­sion, which would have avoid­ed this out­come.”

“The bud­get we are reject­ing today does not just break your promis­es. It has nei­ther direc­tion nor vision. It’s a tech­no­crat­ic bud­get that con­tin­ues to slide down­hill, care­ful not to touch the totem that is uncon­trolled immi­gra­tion,” Le Pen declared.

Despite attempts by Macron loy­al­ists to feign out­rage over the col­lab­o­ra­tion between the Nation­al Ral­ly and the New Pop­u­lar Front to take down the gov­ern­ment, such cri­tiques rang hol­low, giv­en Macron’s deci­sion in July to form an elec­tion pact with the far-left to pre­vent Le Pen’s par­ty from win­ning the elec­tion and tak­ing pow­er. Le Pen respond­ed to the crit­i­cism on Wednes­day by say­ing that join­ing the no con­fi­dence vote did not rep­re­sent a part­ner­ship with the far-left and that she was mere­ly using them as a “tool”.

Fol­low­ing the no con­fi­dence vote bring­ing down the gov­ern­ment, Barnier will be able to hang on in the form of a care­tak­er until Pres­i­dent Macron appoints a new prime min­is­ter. Barnier will be pre­vent­ed from pass­ing new leg­is­la­tion, how­ev­er, he can enact emer­gency mea­sures, includ­ing poten­tial­ly approv­ing mon­ey to fund pub­lic ser­vices to avoid an Amer­i­can-style gov­ern­ment shut down.

In a last ditch media push attempt to save his job, Barnier warned Tues­day evening that pre­vent­ing his gov­ern­ment from pass­ing a bud­get for next year, would auto­mat­i­cal­ly increase the tax­es of 18 mil­lion peo­ple in the nation.

How­ev­er, Nation­al Ral­ly pres­i­dent Jor­dan Bardel­la brand­ed the asser­tion as “total­ly false” and a tac­tic to “scare” the peo­ple. He said, cit­ing a sim­i­lar exam­ple in 1979, that the Nation­al Assem­bly can pass a spe­cial law to adjust tax rates to pre­vent hikes.

While the col­lapse of the gov­ern­ment and the fail­ure to pass a bud­get threat­en to fur­ther desta­bi­lize the country’s econ­o­my, with bor­row­ing costs for France sur­pass­ing that of chron­i­cal­ly in debt Greece for the first time briefly this week amid the polit­i­cal tur­moil, Bardel­la argued that Barnier’s bud­get was a greater threat to the French econ­o­my than oust­ing Barnier from office, point­ing to the approx­i­mate 40 bil­lion euros worth of tax hikes on the already strug­gling econ­o­my.

“This bud­get is dan­ger­ous for the coun­try,” the RN leader said, warn­ing that it would “plunge our econ­o­my into a sig­nif­i­cant reces­sion and weak­en the pur­chas­ing pow­er of the most vul­ner­a­ble.”

“There­fore, I take my respon­si­bil­i­ties and I assume the promis­es we made to our vot­ers, name­ly to pro­tect them.”

Fol­low Kurt Zin­dul­ka on X: or e‑mail to: [email protected]