Dems renew push for lim­it­ing pres­i­den­tial clemen­cy pow­ers after Hunter Biden par­don

Sev­er­al House Democ­rats are renew­ing calls to put more guardrails on the exec­u­tive branch’s clemen­cy pow­ers after Pres­i­dent Biden’s sweep­ing par­don for his son, Hunter.

Rep. Steve Cohen, D‑Tenn., who has intro­duced a con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment lim­it­ing pres­i­den­tial par­don pow­ers in sev­er­al con­gres­sion­al terms, defend­ed Biden’s deci­sion but said he hoped those who were crit­i­cal of the deci­sion would co-spon­sor his mea­sure.

“The par­don pow­er is sup­posed to be a safe­ty valve against injus­tice, and I under­stand why Pres­i­dent Biden thought it appro­pri­ate in this instance,” Cohen said ear­li­er this week.

“But to all those who find this par­don dis­taste­ful, I encour­age you to cospon­sor and sup­port the con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment I have intro­duced in the last sev­er­al Con­gress­es to reform the par­don pow­er. The mea­sure would elim­i­nate par­dons for the President’s self, the President’s fam­i­ly, Admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials and cam­paign staff, and those who com­mit crimes on behalf of, for the ben­e­fit of, or at the direc­tion of the Pres­i­dent – all instances with inescapable per­cep­tions of con­flicts of inter­est.”

LAWMAKERS HARSHLY CRITICIZE BIDEN’S DECISION TO PARDON HUNTER 

It comes as a wave of Democ­rats have expressed unease with the par­don, argu­ing its broad nature sets a prece­dent for future abuse.

A spokesper­son for Rep. Don Bey­er, D‑Va., who pre­vi­ous­ly backed Cohen’s amend­ment, said the lawmaker’s posi­tion has not changed.

“If Repub­li­cans recon­sid­er their will­ing­ness to over­look ram­pant abus­es of par­don pow­ers by the Pres­i­dent-elect, and drop their oppo­si­tion to par­don reform, that would be a good thing – espe­cial­ly giv­en his promis­es to par­don vio­lent crim­i­nals who bru­tal­ly assault­ed police offi­cers on Jan­u­ary 6th,” the spokesper­son said.

Sev­er­al Democ­rats who spoke with Fox News Dig­i­tal sig­naled open­ness to some lim­i­ta­tions on par­dons.

HUNTER BIDEN SAYS HIS MISTAKES WERE ‘EXPLOITED’ FOR POLITICAL SPORT, HE WILL NEVER TAKE PARDON FOR GRANTED 

Rep. Glenn Ivey, D‑Md., did not reject sup­port­ing the amend­ment but doubt­ed there would be enough polit­i­cal momen­tum for such a change. He also urged Biden to extend his clemen­cy pow­ers to peo­ple jailed on minor charges.

“It’s some­thing that we could look at. But I’d be more inter­est­ed in sort of focus­ing on uses of the par­don pow­er. Thou­sands of peo­ple that should be par­doned or have their sen­tences com­mut­ed are in jail for minor offens­es,” Ivey said. “I’d love to see them focus on that.”

Rep. Joaquin Cas­tro, D‑Texas, said, “I think we need to look at pres­i­den­tial par­dons. The Con­gress needs to look at pres­i­den­tial par­dons, gen­er­al­ly. And it’s a large con­ver­sa­tion regard­ing dif­fer­ent issues – for exam­ple, when a pres­i­dent can par­don some­body whose crimes may have been relat­ed to the pres­i­dent.”

“Cohen’s bill is worth talk­ing through. I think he men­tioned that there weren’t any Repub­li­can co-spon­sors, so hope­ful­ly he gets them now,” said Rep. Greg Lands­man, D‑Ohio.

Repub­li­cans, how­ev­er, were skep­ti­cal.

“What we have now has been in place for hun­dreds of years. And you know, we’re not always going to agree with things that one par­ty does or anoth­er par­ty does, but I think it’s some­thing that needs to stand,” Rep. Mike Ezell, R‑Miss., told Fox News Dig­i­tal.

Rep. Ralph Nor­man, R‑S.C., said lim­it­ing par­don pow­ers would be “a slip­pery slope” but accused Biden of “abus­ing” the respon­si­bil­i­ty.

BIDEN PARDONS SON HUNTER BIDEN AHEAD OF EXIT FROM OVAL OFFICE

House GOP Pol­i­cy Chair­man Gary Palmer, R‑Ala., mean­while, did not com­ment on lim­it­ing par­don pow­ers but said they must not go away alto­geth­er.

“The fact that Joe Biden is basi­cal­ly pro­tect­ing a crime fam­i­ly and has over­stepped his author­i­ty, and basi­cal­ly exposed him­self to be a liar, would not be jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for elim­i­nat­ing it across the board,” he said.

Hunter Biden’s par­don cov­ers any and all pos­si­ble crimes between 2014 and Decem­ber 2024. It came as he was fac­ing pos­si­ble jail sen­tences over sep­a­rate firearms and tax charges.

The 82-year-old pres­i­dent accused Repub­li­cans of weaponiz­ing the jus­tice sys­tem against his son, who he said was “selec­tive­ly, and unfair­ly, pros­e­cut­ed.”

Mean­while, House Speak­er Mike John­son, R‑La., promised “reform” dur­ing his week­ly press con­fer­ence on Wednes­day but did not go into fur­ther detail.

“This par­don is a per­ver­sion of jus­tice, and it is an utter dis­re­gard for the rule of law. And it under­mines, fur­ther under­mines the peo­ple’s faith in our sys­tem of jus­tice,” John­son said. “So we have reform on the way, and it can­not hap­pen soon enough.”