State Depart­ment Alums Take Aim at For­eign Ser­vice Reform

The Hud­son Insti­tute host­ed a Tues­day pan­el dis­cus­sion on the poten­tial for a reform of the State Depart­ment and the U.S. For­eign Ser­vice under the incom­ing Trump admin­is­tra­tion. 

The pan­elists, Simon Han­k­in­son, a senior researcher at the Her­itage Foun­da­tion, Drew Peter­son, an adjunct pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pitts­burgh, and Tibor Nagy, the for­mer assis­tant sec­re­tary of state for Africa, pro­posed that the State Depart­ment has become bloat­ed and over­ly bureau­crat­ic, hand­i­capped by a fail­ure to clear­ly con­cep­tu­al­ize the intend­ed goals of the depart­ment and its appendages and suf­fer­ing from a lack of tal­ent and train­ing.

The pan­elists sug­gest­ed a num­ber of impor­tant reforms that the incom­ing Trump admin­is­tra­tion can take to cre­ate a stronger, more effi­cient diplo­mat­ic corps. The first was to imme­di­ate­ly elim­i­nate the DEIA require­ments from the State Department’s core pre­cepts, as well as the hir­ing and pro­mo­tion process­es. In the past sev­er­al decades, Simon Han­k­in­son explained, hir­ing and pro­mo­tion have been delib­er­ate­ly skewed to ben­e­fit cer­tain minor­i­ty groups, espe­cial­ly women, rather than select­ing on the basis of mer­it. This pro­duces a depart­ment with poor­er per­for­mance and diverts ener­gy that should be direct­ed into serv­ing the nation­al inter­est into attempt­ing ever-more-rad­i­cal social engi­neer­ing for fur­ther diver­si­ty gains.

The elim­i­na­tion of DEI should be accom­pa­nied by a restruc­tur­ing of the hir­ing and pro­mo­tion process, added Peter­son, not­ing that the cur­rent process wastes mas­sive amounts of time and pri­or­i­tizes the inter­ests of for­eign ser­vice offi­cers rather than the effec­tive pro­duc­tion of results. The new process should empha­size bring­ing in younger tal­ent to bet­ter fill out junior ser­vice grades, be more flex­i­ble to facil­i­tate the eas­i­er acqui­si­tion of expert tal­ent from out­side the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment and ulti­mate­ly strive to out­fit the depart­ment for long-term diplo­mat­ic com­pe­ti­tion with the People’s Repub­lic of Chi­na.

Nagy assert­ed that one of the prin­ci­pal goals of the Trump admin­is­tra­tion should be to ratio­nal­ize the struc­ture of state depart­ment offices and bureaus, not­ing that the cur­rent struc­ture results in the mas­sive mis­di­rec­tion of resources to pro­duc­ing paper­work as opposed to doing diplo­ma­cy. Nagy pro­posed the whole­sale elim­i­na­tion of large num­bers of spe­cial envoys and sin­gle-issue offices, as well as the rein­state­ment of the Small Embassies Pro­gram, to reduce staff and exempt par­tic­i­pat­ing embassies from nor­mal require­ments for paper­work, allow­ing them to focus on com­plet­ing their diplo­mat­ic mis­sions.

The pan­el closed with the mod­er­a­tor, Matt Boyse, a fel­low at the Hud­son Insti­tute, not­ing that many of these prob­lems have been present for years with­out effec­tive action from either pres­i­den­tial admin­is­tra­tions or Con­gress, and that the arrival of the new Trump admin­is­tra­tion pro­vides an oppor­tu­ni­ty to make urgent reforms.

The post State Depart­ment Alums Take Aim at For­eign Ser­vice Reform appeared first on The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive.