New York­er Jour­nal­ist Smears Com­bat Vet­er­an Who Debunked Her Hit Piece on Pete Hegseth

New Yorker Journalist Smears Combat Veteran Who Debunked Her Hit Piece on Pete Hegseth

The New York­er‘s Jane May­er — who pre­vi­ous­ly pushed the Rus­sia col­lu­sion hoax against Pres­i­dent-elect Don­ald Trump — on Tues­day attacked com­bat vet­er­an and for­mer U.S. House can­di­date Sean Par­nell for debunk­ing her hit piece on Trump Defense Sec­re­tary Nom­i­nee Pete Hegseth.

May­er pub­lished a piece on Hegseth Sun­day that recy­cled old claims from a decade ago from dis­grun­tled ex-cowork­ers of his who were fired from a vet­er­ans advo­ca­cy orga­ni­za­tion that Hegseth ran between 2013 and 2016.

The anony­mous­ly-sourced claims were that Hegseth drank at hol­i­day par­ties and after­work events as he trav­eled around the coun­try mobi­liz­ing vet­er­ans to vote and was forced to resign from the orga­ni­za­tion, as well as anoth­er vet­er­ans advo­ca­cy orga­ni­za­tion, due to mis­man­age­ment.

How­ev­er, Par­nell, a retired U.S. Army Ranger who worked with Hegseth at Con­cerned Vet­er­ans for Amer­i­ca, went on the record to reject those claims. He told Com­pact Mag­a­zine, “I was there for most of those alleged inci­dents, and this stuff is just com­plete fab­ri­ca­tions.”

He added that the so-called “whistle­blow­er” claims in the New York­er piece were from “peo­ple who were let go as the orga­ni­za­tion was grow­ing, who weren’t ful­fill­ing their duties. They just weren’t.”

Par­nell also said Hegseth was not forced out of his posi­tion due to per­son­al mis­con­duct or mis­man­age­ment, say­ing, “That couldn’t be fur­ther from the truth.”

Par­nell said,

This was right before Pres­i­dent Trump began his first term. Pete and I were on the media all the time, talk­ing about nation­al secu­ri­ty and for­eign pol­i­cy. And he and I became big believ­ers in Trump’s vision of for­eign pol­i­cy. The fun­ders of that orga­ni­za­tion [CVA] didn’t nec­es­sar­i­ly believe that. And because of that pol­i­cy dif­fer­ence, over what America’s for­eign and nation­al-secu­ri­ty pol­i­cy should be, Pete part­ed ways. It was 100 per­cent pro­fes­sion­al, polit­i­cal dif­fer­ences.

Par­nell also said the claim that Hegseth had no imme­di­ate job options was not true either. “He was a Fox News con­trib­u­tor,” adding he was in nego­ti­a­tions to become a full-time anchor and that “ABC was inter­est­ed in him, as well.”

The New York Post on Wednes­day post­ed a 2016 let­ter from a CVA trustee that backed up Parnell’s account and demol­ished a key claim in Mayer’s piece.

It said:

The truth is Pete resigned his posi­tion as CEO of Con­cerned Vet­er­ans for Amer­i­ca as a result of a dif­fer­ence of opin­ion as to the future of the orga­ni­za­tion and so that he could focus on oth­er endeav­ors, includ­ing his rela­tion­ship with Fox News. Pete was not ter­mi­nat­ed by the orga­ni­za­tion and, in fact, we at CVA worked with him though this dif­fi­cult deci­sion and mutu­al­ly agreed the end of 2015 was the best tim­ing for both par­ties.

The bot­tom line is that Pete Hegseth vol­un­tar­i­ly resigned his posi­tion and CVA rec­og­nizes and appre­ci­ates his accom­plish­ments as CEO. Pete pro­vid­ed strong lead­er­ship dur­ing the growth of CVA as an influ­en­tial orga­ni­za­tion on many fronts. We wish him much suc­cess.

For his sub­stan­ti­at­ed defense of Hegseth, May­er smeared Par­nell — a com­bat vet­er­an with a Pur­ple Heart and two Bronze Stars — post­ing on X:

I thought at 1st this was a joke: Pete Hegseth’s char­ac­ter wit­ness was accused of chok­ing his wife

Mayer’s smear against Par­nell came from an ex-wife dur­ing a con­tentious divorce, with no evi­dence that it ever hap­pened.

Par­nell fired back at May­er: “Yeah of course I’m defend­ing Pete. I know exact­ly how it feels to be false­ly accused with zero cor­rob­o­rat­ing evi­dence by soul­less hacks like you. But I’m through it now & Pete will get through it too.”

Parnell’s wife, Melanie Par­nell, also blast­ed May­er, call­ing her a “dis­gust­ing hack.” She post­ed on X:

You are the joke, you dis­gust­ing hack. You par­rot false alle­ga­tions made dur­ing a con­tentious divorce which had zero cor­rob­o­rat­ing evi­dence & were refut­ed by his kids & oth­ers in the house­hold. You smear @SeanParnellUSA, a great father & hus­band & dec­o­rat­ed com­bat vet, but are silent about the alle­ga­tions against Doug Emhoff, Kei­th Elli­son, Raphael Warnock, etc. You are a pathet­ic excuse for a jour­nal­ist.

Bre­it­bart News — which obtained a copy of what the dis­grun­tled ex-cowork­ers had com­piled against Hegseth and was made aware that May­er planned a hit piece on Hegseth — con­tact­ed her before she pub­lished her piece, ask­ing:

Can you please pro­vide a com­ment on why you are writ­ing a sto­ry about Pete Hegseth that con­tains unver­i­fied alle­ga­tions from a dis­grun­tled for­mer cowork­er of his? I would appre­ci­ate it.

May­er nev­er respond­ed and pro­ceed­ed to pub­lish.

May­er recent­ly gushed about for­mer Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma cam­paign­ing for Vice Pres­i­dent Kamala Har­ris on an Octo­ber 23 New York­er pod­cast episode, ask­ing the host, Susan Glaser, “Did you see Oba­ma last night?” and agree­ing with Glaser that he was “amaz­ing.”

She also said she felt bad for young Jus­tice Depart­ment employ­ees who had to decide whether to stay in gov­ern­ment under Trump, or leave, and said it gave her “com­fort” that “checks and bal­ances” worked to sink for­mer Rep. Matt Gaetz (R‑FL)’s nom­i­na­tion as attor­ney gen­er­al.

May­er wrote a lengthy pro­file on dis­cred­it­ed ex-British spy Christo­pher Steele, who was hired by oppo­si­tion research firm Fusion GPS to fab­ri­cate the so-called Steele Dossier, which claimed there was a pee tape of Trump and Russ­ian pros­ti­tutes. It turned out that most of the infor­ma­tion had been Russ­ian dis­in­for­ma­tion fun­neled to Brook­ings Insti­tu­tion researcher Igor Danchenko.

Fol­low Bre­it­bart News’s Kristi­na Wong on ”X”, Truth Social, or on Face­book.