Sec­ond Major City In Syr­ia Falls To Rebel Forces

Rebel forces took over the Syr­i­an city of Hama on Thurs­day, the sec­ond major city lost to the rebels since the long-sim­mer­ing civ­il war reignit­ed last week.

Mil­i­tant forces led by the group Hay­at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) moved into Hama on Thurs­day, rep­re­sen­ta­tives of HTS and the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment told NBC News. The fall of Hama to the rebels, the fourth-largest city in Syr­ia, comes after HTS took the city of Alep­po in a sur­prise attack last week.

A com­man­der of the rebel forces, Has­san Abdul-Ghani, said that HTS mil­i­tants took the city and “entered the Hama Cen­tral Prison and freed hun­dreds of unjust­ly impris­oned indi­vid­u­als.”

Syria’s defense min­istry said in a state­ment post­ed online that regime forces pulled out of the city “to safe­guard the lives of the civil­ian pop­u­la­tion in Hama and to avoid involv­ing them in urban com­bat, the mil­i­tary units sta­tioned there have rede­ployed and repo­si­tioned out­side the city.”

HTS, or the Orga­ni­za­tion for the Lib­er­a­tion of the Lev­ant, began as the al-Qae­da-affil­i­at­ed group Jab­hat al-Nus­ra before break­ing away from the ter­ror group. HTS was clas­si­fied as a ter­ror group by the Unit­ed States in 2018. The group has received sup­port from Turkey in its civ­il war against the regime of Syr­i­an Pres­i­dent Bashar al-Assad, who has received sup­port from Rus­sia, Iran, and Iran’s ter­ror net­work.

CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE

Hama, nev­er before tak­en by the rebels, is strate­gi­cal­ly impor­tant to the war effort because of its mil­i­tary resources, accord­ing to experts. It is also rough­ly 30 miles from the cen­tral­ly-locat­ed city of Homs.

Though Assad’s regime is backed by states hos­tile to U.S. inter­ests, Iran and Rus­sia, and the rebel forces are backed by a NATO mem­ber, Turkey, the Unit­ed States has not sup­port­ed either side in the civ­il war. U.S. nation­al secu­ri­ty advis­er Jake Sul­li­van sug­gest­ed ear­li­er this week that nei­ther side is pos­i­tive for U.S. inter­ests in the region.

“It’s a com­pli­cat­ed ques­tion because the group at the van­guard of this rebel advance, HTS, is actu­al­ly a ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion des­ig­nat­ed by the Unit­ed States. So, we have real con­cerns about the designs and objec­tives of that orga­ni­za­tion,” Sul­li­van said. “At the same time, of course, we don’t cry over the fact that the Assad gov­ern­ment – backed by Rus­sia, Iran, and Hezbol­lah – you know, are fac­ing cer­tain kinds of pres­sure. So, it’s a com­pli­cat­ed sit­u­a­tion, it’s one we are mon­i­tor­ing close­ly, and we are stay­ing in close touch with region­al part­ners about it.”

Israel, arguably the strongest U.S. ally in the Mid­dle East, has tak­en a sim­i­lar approach. The best out­come from the civ­il war, accord­ing to Israeli offi­cials, is for the two sides to wear each oth­er down so nei­ther is a threat to the Jew­ish state.

“It’s entire­ly clear to us that one side are Salafi jihadists and the oth­er side is Iran and Hezbol­lah,” an Israeli offi­cial told The Times of Israel. “We want them to weak­en one anoth­er.”

“We are pre­pared for any sce­nario, and we will act accord­ing­ly,” the offi­cial said.