‘Sig­nif­i­cant Evi­dence Of Real Harm’: Ten­nessee AG Clash­es With CNN Host Over Child Sex Change Ban

‘Significant Evidence Of Real Harm’: Tennessee AG Clashes With CNN Host Over Child Sex Change Ban

Repub­li­can Attor­ney Gen­er­al Jonathan Skrmet­ti of Ten­nessee clashed with “CNN News Cen­tral” co-host Kate Bold­u­an Thurs­day over the state’s ban on child sex change pro­ce­dures, say­ing the gov­ern­ment had a right to act when pre­sent­ed with “sig­nif­i­cant evi­dence” the pro­ce­dures caused “real harm.”

The Supreme Court heard oral argu­ments Wednes­day in Unit­ed States v. Skrmet­ti, a case cen­tered on a chal­lenge to Tennessee’s law pro­hibit­ing child sex change pro­ce­dures. Bold­u­an ques­tioned if the ban vio­lat­ed parental rights. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: Red States Paint Grim Pic­ture In Supreme Court Brief If Men Are Allowed To Com­pete In Girls’ Sports)

“What was not square­ly at issue with this spe­cif­ic appeal before the jus­tices right now is parental rights,” Bold­u­an said to Skrmet­ti. “Do you think par­ents should have the right to make med­ical deci­sions for their chil­dren?”

WATCH:

“I think to some extent, par­ents should. I think par­ents have a huge role to play in their kids;’ lives, but the gov­ern­ment also has a role to play to reg­u­late the med­ical pro­fes­sion and if the evi­dence is show­ing sig­nif­i­cant harm with min­i­mal ben­e­fit, the gov­ern­ment does have a role in ensur­ing that kids are safe,” Skrmet­ti respond­ed. “Now, this is a very con­tentious issue. The court did not take up the parental rights issue, and I think it would have sub­stan­tial­ly com­pli­cat­ed the argu­ments because it’s a whole oth­er very com­plex issue to address.”

Skrmet­ti also not­ed that there were ques­tions about the effi­ca­cy of the treat­ments and said that some research has been “manip­u­lat­ed.” He also expressed doubts that par­ents had “accu­rate infor­ma­tion” about the poten­tial risks asso­ci­at­ed with the var­i­ous drugs and pro­ce­dures.

“But you know, there’s sig­nif­i­cant evi­dence of real harm. The research has been manip­u­lat­ed,” Skrmet­ti told Bold­u­an. “I don’t know that par­ents are get­ting accu­rate infor­ma­tion nec­es­sar­i­ly about the risks involved and about the ben­e­fits and in sit­u­a­tions like that, the gov­ern­ment has a role to play to pro­tect its cit­i­zens, espe­cial­ly its young cit­i­zens.” (RELATED: Dai­ly Caller Doc­u­men­tary Reveals How Cru­cial Supreme Court Rul­ing On Child Sex Changes Will Be)

One doc­tor involved in child sex change pro­ce­dures admit­ted in Octo­ber she sup­pressed a study that ques­tioned the effec­tive­ness of the treat­ments, say­ing she feared the results would be used to sup­port restric­tions on the pro­ce­dures.

All con­tent cre­at­ed by the Dai­ly Caller News Foun­da­tion, an inde­pen­dent and non­par­ti­san newswire ser­vice, is avail­able with­out charge to any legit­i­mate news pub­lish­er that can pro­vide a large audi­ence. All repub­lished arti­cles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affil­i­a­tion. For any ques­tions about our guide­lines or part­ner­ing with us, please con­tact [email protected].