Uni­ver­si­ty Of Michi­gan Drops DEI State­ments In Fac­ul­ty Hir­ing

The Uni­ver­si­ty of Michi­gan announced on Thurs­day that it has elim­i­nat­ed diver­si­ty, equi­ty, and inclu­sion (DEI) state­ments from its fac­ul­ty hir­ing, pro­mo­tion, and tenure process­es.

Some uni­ver­si­ty com­mu­ni­ty mem­bers cel­e­brat­ed the deci­sion to scrap the DEI state­ments, which indi­vid­u­als were asked to pro­vide to demon­strate what they’ve done and plan to do to advance such poli­cies. They said the state­ments were used as ide­o­log­i­cal lit­mus tests and enforced intel­lec­tu­al con­for­mi­ty.

“I applaud the provost for end­ing the prac­tice of requir­ing diver­si­ty state­ments,” said Sarah Hub­bard, one of the regents on the eight-per­son board over­see­ing the uni­ver­si­ty. “This pol­i­cy change removes a bar­ri­er to diver­si­ty of thought on cam­pus by elim­i­nat­ing the ide­o­log­i­cal lit­mus test.”

Provost Lau­rie McCauley announced the deci­sion on Thurs­day after form­ing a fac­ul­ty com­mit­tee to review the use of diver­si­ty state­ments.

“Crit­ics of diver­si­ty state­ments per­ceive them as expres­sions of per­son­al iden­ti­ty traits, sup­port of spe­cif­ic ide­ol­o­gy or opin­ions on social­ly-rel­e­vant issues, and serve as a ‘lit­mus test’ of whether a fac­ul­ty member’s views are polit­i­cal­ly accept­able,” the com­mit­tee stat­ed in a report. “Thus, as cur­rent­ly enact­ed, diver­si­ty state­ments have the poten­tial to lim­it view­points and reduce diver­si­ty of thought among fac­ul­ty mem­bers.”

While the Uni­ver­si­ty of Michi­gan Board of Regents is set to meet on Thurs­day, Hub­bard says she doesn’t expect it to address any oth­er DEI issues at this time.

CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE

The Uni­ver­si­ty of Michigan’s deci­sion fol­lows the Mass­a­chu­setts Insti­tute of Technology’s announce­ment over the sum­mer that it would dis­con­tin­ue using DEI state­ments in the hir­ing process.

“Requests for a state­ment on diver­si­ty will no longer be part of appli­ca­tions for any fac­ul­ty posi­tions at MIT,” one MIT rep­re­sen­ta­tive said at the time.

“My goals are to tap into the full scope of human tal­ent, to bring the very best to MIT, and to make sure they thrive once here,” MIT Pres­i­dent Sal­ly Korn­bluth said. “We can build an inclu­sive envi­ron­ment in many ways, but com­pelled state­ments impinge on free­dom of expres­sion, and they don’t work.”

Har­vard University’s Fac­ul­ty of Arts and Sci­ences also announced this sum­mer that it would dis­con­tin­ue the use of diver­si­ty state­ments in its hir­ing process.