Defense In Daniel Pen­ny Case Says Pros­e­cu­tion Improp­er­ly Sig­nal­ing To The Jury

This week, Daniel Penny’s defense attor­neys flagged Judge Maxwell Wiley to what they say are improp­er and mis­lead­ing actions by Man­hat­tan Dis­trict Attor­ney Alvin Bragg’s office work­ing with the media. 

Pen­ny, a 26-year-old Marine vet­er­an, is on tri­al for the death of Jor­dan Neely, whom Pen­ny restrained on the NYC sub­way last year after Neely alleged­ly threat­ened pas­sen­gers.

The defense says Bragg’s office has been aggres­sive­ly push­ing the media to add in their cov­er­age that there’s no manda­to­ry min­i­mum sen­tence if Pen­ny is con­vict­ed on the sec­ond-degree manslaugh­ter charge. 

“The Dis­trict Attorney’s efforts to have the jury spec­u­late as to a poten­tial sen­tence are both improp­er and mis­lead­ing,” Pen­ny attor­neys Steven Rais­er and Thomas Ken­niff told Fox News. “While it is tech­ni­cal­ly true that these charges do not car­ry a manda­to­ry min­i­mum, that is the case with most felonies in New York. It is equal­ly true that the max­i­mum sen­tence is 15 years in state prison.”

“More­over, the tenac­i­ty with which the Dis­trict Attor­ney has sought to obtain a con­vic­tion against Mr. Pen­ny strong­ly sug­gests that they will advo­cate for a sub­stan­tial sen­tence in the event of a guilty ver­dict,” the attor­neys added.

A defense attor­ney named Danielle Iredale told Fox that this appears to be a sig­nal to the jury that it’s okay for them to con­vict Pen­ny since he poten­tial­ly won’t serve any time behind bars.

“Defense lawyers are barred from men­tion­ing poten­tial sen­tences at tri­al — the rea­son­ing being that it would be an attempt to seek sym­pa­thy from jurors who then may reach a ver­dict based on some­thing oth­er than the facts, In oth­er words, ‘He may be guilty, but 10 years is too much time,’” Iredale explained. “Here, there is a hypocrisy to the DA’s mes­sag­ing. In attempt­ing to pub­lish the fact that there is no statu­to­ry manda­to­ry min­i­mum sen­tence, they are essen­tial­ly say­ing, ‘It’s OK to con­vict, he may not go to the jail!’”

In clos­ing argu­ments and through­out the tri­al, the state has argued that Pen­ny went “too far” and was “reck­less” when restrain­ing Neely, ulti­mate­ly killing him. 

Con­tro­ver­sial­ly, the pros­e­cu­tion has leaned heav­i­ly into race, imply­ing that Pen­ny, who is white, was moti­vat­ed by Neely’s race when restrain­ing him. Notably, Assis­tant Dis­trict Attor­ney Daf­na Yoran has referred to Pen­ny as “the white man” dur­ing the tri­al, while refer­ring to Neely by his name, The Dai­ly Wire report­ed. She also told the jury dur­ing clos­ing argu­ments that Pen­ny “didn’t rec­og­nize that Jor­dan Neely was a per­son” and viewed Neely as “a per­son [who] need­ed to be elim­i­nat­ed.”

The defense, alter­na­tive­ly, has repeat­ed­ly asked the jury to con­sid­er who they’d want on the sub­way with them if they were under a seri­ous threat. Rais­er argued that Pen­ny could have done noth­ing when Neely alleged­ly threat­ened ter­ri­fied sub­way rid­ers, but instead, he chose to act, putting his “own life on the line” to pro­tect “per­fect strangers.”

CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE

Penny’s defense has also raised seri­ous doubt about the man­ner in which Neely died. The New York med­ical exam­in­er said he died of asphyx­i­a­tion, but, con­tro­ver­sial­ly, she admit­ted dur­ing the tri­al that she made that deter­mi­na­tion based on viral video evi­dence before she ever received a tox­i­col­o­gy report. 

More­over, a foren­sic pathol­o­gist brought by the defense tes­ti­fied that Neely’s death was caused by the “com­bined effects” of sick­le cell, K2, which is a syn­thet­ic drug tied to psy­chosis, schiz­o­phre­nia, and oth­er fac­tors. He also said that the choke­hold did not direct­ly kill Neely.

Notably, Neely still had a pulse when police arrived on the scene. Mouth-to-mouth was not giv­en to Neely because, accord­ing to police tes­ti­mo­ny, he looked filthy and like an appar­ent drug user. 

Pen­ny has been charged with sec­ond-degree manslaugh­ter, which car­ries a 15-year sen­tence, and crim­i­nal­ly neg­li­gent homi­cide, which car­ries a four-year sen­tence. Clos­ing argu­ments in the case wrapped on Tues­day, and the jury will con­tin­ue delib­er­a­tions on Fri­day.