‘Social Cru­sades’: End­ing The Woke Agen­da At The State Depart­ment

The Depart­ment of State, estab­lished in 1789, is the old­est exec­u­tive agency in the Unit­ed States. Found­ed to han­dle for­eign affairs, pro­mote peace, and rep­re­sent America’s inter­ests abroad, it played a piv­otal role under the lead­er­ship of Thomas Jef­fer­son, the first Sec­re­tary of State, in estab­lish­ing the U.S. as a glob­al leader for free­dom and democ­ra­cy dur­ing an era dom­i­nat­ed by Euro­pean mon­archs and despots.

Today, the Depart­ment has dan­ger­ous­ly drift­ed far from its found­ing mis­sion. Thomas Jef­fer­son would hard­ly rec­og­nize the insti­tu­tion — or the nation — it rep­re­sents. Jefferson’s Depart­ment has suc­cumbed to “woke cul­ture,” under­min­ing its effec­tive­ness and jeop­ar­diz­ing America’s lead­er­ship on the world stage.

Sen­a­tor Mar­co Rubio, Pres­i­dent-elect Trump’s nom­i­nee for Sec­re­tary of State, stands poised to con­front this destruc­tive ide­ol­o­gy and restore the Department’s focus on advanc­ing nation­al secu­ri­ty and tra­di­tion­al Amer­i­can val­ues. Sen­a­tor Rubio has always been a staunch defend­er of Amer­i­can free­dom, both at home and abroad, with a deep com­mit­ment to com­bat­ing com­mu­nist regimes, espe­cial­ly giv­en his Cuban her­itage. As the son of Cuban immi­grants, Rubio under­stands first­hand the dan­gers of total­i­tar­i­an­ism and the impor­tance of stand­ing against oppres­sive regimes. Rubio believes that Amer­i­ca First means return­ing to the core prin­ci­ples of secu­ri­ty, pros­per­i­ty, and demo­c­ra­t­ic val­ues, rather than enforc­ing par­ti­san ide­olo­gies.

For years, the rad­i­cal Left has side­lined tra­di­tion­al ideals like Sen­a­tor Rubio’s in favor of Diver­si­ty, Equi­ty, Inclu­sion, and Acces­si­bil­i­ty (DEIA) ini­tia­tives. Instead of cham­pi­oning democ­ra­cy and rein­forc­ing America’s foun­da­tion­al prin­ci­ples, diplo­mats have spent resources pro­mot­ing drag the­ater per­for­mances in Ecuador under the guise of nation­al secu­ri­ty. Rather than address­ing seri­ous threats like com­mu­nism, our Cul­tur­al Offi­cers pro­mot­ed a film fes­ti­val fea­tur­ing incest and pedophil­ia in Por­tu­gal. The Biden-appoint­ed U.S. ambas­sador to France has replaced por­traits of Amer­i­can Found­ing Fathers with images of a trans­gen­der activist, a vio­lent pro­test­er, social­ist icons, and com­mu­nists.

The obses­sion with pro­mot­ing pro­gres­sive social val­ues has dan­ger­ous­ly erod­ed America’s stand­ing abroad. Adver­saries like Com­mu­nist Chi­na — like­ly amused by an ambas­sador swap­ping por­traits of Amer­i­can heroes for com­mu­nists — exploit this ide­o­log­i­cal pre­oc­cu­pa­tion, bol­ster­ing their influ­ence while the U.S. falls behind.

My per­son­al expe­ri­ence attend­ing events in Wash­ing­ton, D.C., with State Depart­ment offi­cials under­scores the prob­lem. At these gath­er­ings, I often spoke pas­sion­ate­ly about the hope many oppressed peo­ple place in Amer­i­ca — those yearn­ing for free­dom from author­i­tar­i­an regimes and seek­ing the basic human rights we often take for grant­ed. After all, I saw it first­hand grow­ing up under an oppres­sive gov­ern­ment.

Instead of tack­ling crit­i­cal glob­al chal­lenges, State Depart­ment rep­re­sen­ta­tives often steered our dis­cus­sions toward their woke agen­da, empha­siz­ing pro­gres­sive and ide­o­log­i­cal ini­tia­tives that mean lit­tle to oppressed pop­u­la­tions seek­ing America’s lead­er­ship and sup­port. I shud­der to imag­ine how a younger ver­sion of myself would have felt if this had been America’s mes­sage to my fam­i­ly in the Sovi­et Union.

Con­sid­er the alarm­ing jux­ta­po­si­tion of pri­or­i­ties: in 2022, the State Depart­ment issued an inter­a­gency strat­e­gy to pro­mote LGBTQ+ rights abroad well before pub­lish­ing the U.S. nation­al secu­ri­ty strat­e­gy. Mean­while, Chi­na has increased its trade with the Gulf Coop­er­a­tion Coun­cil, expand­ed its finan­cial dom­i­nance in Africa and South Amer­i­ca, and solid­i­fied secu­ri­ty pacts in the Pacif­ic — all with­out fac­ing sig­nif­i­cant U.S. resis­tance.

At home, the sit­u­a­tion is equal­ly trou­bling. Instead of address­ing urgent threats like China’s ris­ing pow­er, resources are divert­ed to diver­si­ty recruit­ment and DEIA man­dates. The Department’s Equi­ty Coun­cil, with unclear author­i­ty and no over­sight, pri­or­i­tizes loy­al­ty to pro­gres­sive val­ues over tra­di­tion­al stan­dards like com­pe­tence and integri­ty. Today, becom­ing a front-line diplo­mat for our coun­try requires pass­ing a strin­gent ide­o­log­i­cal test, focused more on woke cre­den­tials than on diplo­mat­ic skills.

This ide­o­log­i­cal drift under­mines the cred­i­bil­i­ty of our diplo­ma­cy. For­eign coun­ter­parts do not view Amer­i­ca as a reli­able part­ner when moral­is­tic lec­tures replace con­struc­tive dia­logue. For instance, rep­ri­mand­ing Viet­nam for its cul­tur­al val­ues while neglect­ing to address Beijing’s aggres­sion in the South Chi­na Sea is not just counterproductive—it sig­nals a dan­ger­ous abdi­ca­tion of lead­er­ship.

CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE

Inclu­siv­i­ty is a core Amer­i­can val­ue, and sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion or moral sham­ing should not be the focus of our diplo­ma­cy. Richard Grenell made his­to­ry as the high­est-rank­ing open­ly gay ambas­sador in U.S. his­to­ry when Pres­i­dent Trump appoint­ed him as Ambas­sador to Ger­many. Despite his ground­break­ing posi­tion, Grenell nev­er made his sex­u­al­i­ty a focal point of his diplo­mat­ic work or pub­lic per­sona. He focused on his role, advanc­ing the President’s mis­sion of Amer­i­ca First, pri­or­i­tiz­ing U.S. inter­ests. His appoint­ment was a tes­ta­ment to the President’s recog­ni­tion of his qual­i­fi­ca­tions and lead­er­ship, not his sex­u­al ori­en­ta­tion. Abil­i­ties mat­ter most, not iden­ti­ty.

The 21st cen­tu­ry will be defined by America’s com­pe­ti­tion with the Chi­nese Com­mu­nist Par­ty, and win­ning that con­test requires a State Depart­ment that pri­or­i­tizes strate­gic inter­ests over social cru­sades. The Amer­i­can elec­torate agrees: Don­ald Trump and Mar­co Rubio are the right peo­ple for the job. Until then, the Depart­ment is a grave risk to our nation­al security—and America’s posi­tion in the world.

* * *

Kari­na Lips­man is a nation­al secu­ri­ty expert and vis­it­ing fel­low at Inde­pen­dent Women’s Forum (iwf.org). She was born and raised in Sovi­et Ukraine and spent 14 years in the U.S. DoD and intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty.

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not nec­es­sar­i­ly rep­re­sent those of The Dai­ly Wire.