The Prin­ci­ples of Thomas Massie

The Principles of Thomas Massie

The Prin­ci­ples of Thomas Massie

The Ken­tuck­ian is tak­ing his stand, come what may.

House Votes On Budget Bill To Fund Government

Cred­it: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Pres­i­dent Trump couldn’t wait to announce the big news. Amid a stock mar­ket col­lapse he promised would only hap­pen if Joe Biden was reelect­ed, Don­ald and his team of online cheer­lead­ers were hyp­ing the re-release of 20-year-old episodes of his real­i­ty show The Appren­tice on Ama­zon Prime Mon­day night.

Mean­while, a man from Ken­tucky was focused on the key issues at hand, name­ly, the ever-increas­ing nation­al debt and its dire con­se­quences for the Amer­i­can peo­ple. Rep. Thomas Massie (R‑KY) was a firm “no” on anoth­er bloat­ed, hasti­ly writ­ten, last-minute con­tin­u­ing res­o­lu­tion that stands to fur­ther the des­per­ate mal­a­dy of debt that has suf­fo­cat­ed our Amer­i­can enter­prise this last half cen­tu­ry. 

For those who have fol­lowed the ebbs and flows of the Trump-led Repub­li­can Par­ty, it would be hard to char­ac­ter­ize Massie’s stand as any­thing oth­er than prin­ci­pled, cor­rect, and true red MAGA. After all, it was only 16 months ago that a high­ly con­tentious and politi­cized tug-of-war spear­head­ed by Trump’s ini­tial AG pick Matt Gaetz removed the gav­el from Speak­er Kevin McCarthy’s hands at the behest of bud­get hawks who decried the McCarthy-led pas­sage of anoth­er bloat­ed, reck­less CR. 

“I’m not vot­ing for the Con­tin­u­ing Res­o­lu­tion bud­get (cut-copy-paste omnibus) this week,” Massie wrote on 𝕏 Mon­day morn­ing. “Why would I vote to con­tin­ue the waste fraud and abuse DOGE has found? The CR is a UNIPARTY deal. It doesn’t fund the wall. It does fund USAID.”

Many of the very Repub­li­can con­gress­men who so loud­ly accused McCarthy of sid­ing with the “DC Uni­par­ty” for push­ing through a sim­i­lar CR in 2023 are sud­den­ly silent now that Trump is in the White House. But not Massie—because Massie has a spine.

“The elec­toral man­date giv­en to the Pres­i­dent and Repub­li­can Con­gress dis­si­pates with every day that pass­es since the elec­tion,” Massie not­ed. “With­in a year, Con­gress will be total­ly inef­fec­tu­al, par­a­lyzed by con­cern about the 2026 midterm elec­tions.”

Massie is right. The clock is tick­ing on Trump’s man­date. The tar­iffs, the slid­ing econ­o­my, the egg prices, the unaf­ford­able hous­es. What­ev­er momen­tum Trump inher­it­ed in late Jan­u­ary has large­ly dis­si­pat­ed. And by this time in Octo­ber, the entire polit­i­cal machine will be churn­ing toward the midterms, and any promise of a red wave man­date via Con­gress will be drift­ing speed­i­ly away into the dis­tance. Trump’s team of flamethrow­ers was focused on a very dif­fer­ent type of clock Mon­day evening.

“Tick-Tock Tim­mie,” threat­ened Trump’s cam­paign man­ag­er, Chris LaCivi­ta, in response to Massie’s promise to vote “no” on the CR. 

What began as an intraright brush fire had esca­lat­ed into an all-out turf war by evening when Trump weighed in. In typ­i­cal Trump fash­ion, he went for the scalp. The pres­i­dent com­pared Massie to neo­con bootlick­er Liz Cheney and demand­ed the Ken­tuck­ian “BE PRIMARIED.” 

“I will lead the charge against him,” Trump promised. “He’s just anoth­er GRANDSTANDER, who’s too much trou­ble, and not worth the fight.”

At a time when many with­in the MAGA move­ment see Massie as the log­i­cal choice to take over Mitch McConnell’s seat upon the long-time senator’s retire­ment, Trump and his clos­est allies want­ed war. But then, some­thing that rarely occurs among the most­ly-lock­step MAGA move­ment took place. One after anoth­er, crit­i­cal coali­tion mem­bers stepped up to protest Trump’s bat­tle cry against Massie as LaCivita’s tweet was ratioed into the deep rings of 𝕏 hell. 

“Seems increas­ing­ly like the only peo­ple inter­est­ed in ful­fill­ing Trump and Musk’s promis­es are Thomas Massie and Rand Paul,” read one viral tweet in response to the fra­cas. The Dai­ly Wire’s Matt Walsh said Trump was “wrong about Massie” in anoth­er viral post. 

“Call­ing Massie a ‘rino’ is asi­nine,” Walsh opined. “Accus­ing him of not being Amer­i­ca First is even dumb­er.”

Ron Paul, the man who was lion­ized for lead­ing the charge against reck­less gov­ern­ment spend­ing dur­ing his decades of ser­vice, was dumb­found­ed by Trump’s threat. 

“Thomas Massie earned the wrath of the pres­i­dent because he said ‘there’s no way I can vote for this,’” Paul said on his Tues­day show. “He hap­pens to believe that you’re sup­posed to fol­low your oath of office; it’s no more com­pli­cat­ed than that.”

“Who­ev­er told Don­ald Trump to post about Thomas Massie just now should be fired,” read a com­ment that gar­nered near­ly 20,000 likes on 𝕏. “I’ve nev­er seen this quick of a push back and con­dem­na­tion against some­thing Trump has said by his most loy­al fol­low­ers.”

Sen. Rand Paul (R‑KY), a politi­cian as prin­ci­pled as any in the Repub­li­can coali­tion, agreed with Massie’s assess­ment of the CR: “The bill con­tin­ues spend­ing at the inflat­ed pan­dem­ic lev­els and will add $2T to the debt this year.”

In an extra show of sup­port on Tues­day morn­ing, Paul’s wife Kel­ley post­ed an image of the Paul and Massie fam­i­lies at Christ­mas with text that read “[Thomas and Rand] have ana­lyt­i­cal minds and vote on prin­ci­ple. We need more of them!”

If any­one was sur­prised by the swift con­dem­na­tion of Trump’s attempt to oust Massie from a seat he has solid­ly held for 13 years, it may have been the pres­i­dent him­self. Though Massie has left no ques­tions about his dif­fi­cul­ties work­ing with Trump, and though the Ken­tucky Con­gress­man ini­tial­ly backed DeSan­tis in the Repub­li­can pri­ma­ry for pres­i­dent, Massie is beloved by many of Trump’s most ardent sup­port­ers, those who see Trump as a ves­sel for eco­nom­ic and anti-war posi­tions that once sat uncom­fort­ably on the fringes of the Repub­li­can Par­ty. 

The good peo­ple of Ken­tucky have nev­er vot­ed for Massie because Trump instruct­ed them to, and it’s doubt­ful they’ll pull their sup­port now. For in Massie is a premise and a promise not often found amongst the traders and fame-hounds who occu­py our Congress—a man of prin­ci­ple. A politi­cian who believes in the sub­stance of the ideas he put for­ward on the cam­paign trail.  

Massie’s hard “no” on the CR is exact­ly why he has so eas­i­ly retained his Con­gres­sion­al seat despite attempts by well-fund­ed pri­ma­ry oppo­nents to unseat the MIT grad. The very con­stituen­cy that makes up Trump’s base has explic­it­ly called for and vot­ed for politi­cians who will make the hard choic­es to elim­i­nate gov­ern­ment waste and spend­ing. If any­one has dis­ap­point­ed the MAGA base, it’s the go-along, get-along mem­bers who glee­ful­ly bend the knee at the president’s call.

“If it pass­es this week, the CR oblig­ates Trump (from now until Sep­tem­ber) to spend the same amounts of mon­ey on gen­er­al­ly the same things Biden spent mon­ey on in his last 15 months in office,” Massie wrote to 𝕏. “The elec­tion was the war. You won it. Now Con­gress is squan­der­ing that vic­to­ry.”

On Tues­day, Speak­er Mike John­son (R‑LA) refused to call for Massie’s ouster when asked about Trump’s threat.

“I’m in the incum­ben­cy pro­tec­tion pro­gram,” joked the Louisiana rep­re­sen­ta­tive. “I con­sid­er Thomas Massie a friend. He’s a thought­ful guy. I guess he’ll tell you he’s doing what he thinks is right, but I vehe­ment­ly dis­agree with his posi­tion, and I’ll leave it at that.”

The key phrase in that state­ment is “he’s doing what he thinks is right.” It’s a phrase not often uttered in Wash­ing­ton. 

Massie’s alle­giance is not to him­self or his bankroll. As of this writ­ing, he has yet to cash in on a meme­coin to enrich his fam­i­ly. He takes no mon­ey from AIPAC, the “babysit­ters” of Con­gress. He doesn’t wheel and deal at the drop of a Sil­i­con Val­ley billionaire’s hat. When it became clear the Covid pan­dem­ic would destroy the world we knew, he didn’t run to his stock­bro­ker and place bets on options or fire-sell his port­fo­lio to the advan­tage of his imme­di­ate kin. Oth­ers did. And as they did, Massie stood in the fire of the House cham­ber and demand­ed a record­ed vote on the pas­sage of a $2 tril­lion Covid relief pack­age. He received scorn and hatred from both par­ties at that moment but earned some­thing much more prized—respect from mil­lions of MAGA vot­ers who strug­gled to under­stand the absolute mania sweep­ing the West­ern world and its inef­fec­tu­al and absent lead­ers.

In many ways, the trou­bling eco­nom­ic con­di­tions we are liv­ing through today began the very moment that absen­tee vot­ing roll was called. Had Trump stood in the breach with Massie and called for Repub­li­cans to rout anoth­er reck­less, hur­ried spend­ing mea­sure that led to a run­away print­ing machine, it is like­ly the severe stagfla­tion num­bers we are see­ing now might have nev­er hap­pened.  

At the very core of the MAGA move­ment sits the rea­son­able and well-found­ed belief that the vast major­i­ty of con­gres­sion­al mem­bers are in it for them­selves, not the peo­ple who put them there. It’s where the term “Uni­par­ty” orig­i­nat­ed. The idea that while mem­bers of Con­gress may say the right things on the cam­paign trail and in soft­ball TV inter­views, rarely do they come through when the bright lights are on, when it mat­ters, when the votes are count­ed in Con­gress. It’s why the wars nev­er end. It’s why the relief nev­er comes. It’s why every year we all help­less­ly watch as anoth­er rushed omnibus or CR bill, so thick they would take weeks to actu­al­ly parse, are vot­ed through with ease to pile on more and more debt threat­en­ing the eco­nom­ic secu­ri­ty of our nation’s future.

But the prin­ci­ples of Thomas Massie refuse to bend. MAGA, Amer­i­ca, and her peo­ple are all a bet­ter nation because of it. 

The post The Prin­ci­ples of Thomas Massie appeared first on The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive.