Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.

Here’s where anti-Big Tech legislation stands as time runs out for Congress to act

Democrats seeking to rein in big business and Republicans worried about censorship have teamed up on legislation to regulate Big Tech, but the opportunity to pass technology-related legislation before the end of the term has shrunken significantly.

The fate of several technology-related bills is unclear in the few remaining months of the term after the August recess and before the midterm elections preoccupy members of Congress. Several of the bills address fears about tech companies’ monopolistic control of the market or their handling of private information.

“It’s hard for me to imagine that Congress is going to go off in October to go campaign without passing at least one of those bills and at least one chamber,” Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Director of Federal Affairs India McKinney told the Washington Examiner.


The bill that has attracted the most attention in the last few months is Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Chuck Grassley’s (R-IA) American Innovation and Choice Online Act. The bill, which targets Big Tech companies, would allow federal antitrust agencies to issue civil penalties to “covered platforms” such as Amazon and Google for unfairly preferencing their own products on their platforms. This has led some lobbyists, including those representing Amazon, to claim that passing this bill would hurt popular services like Amazon Prime’s free shipping. Klobuchar and Grassley have said that Prime would be spared.

The legislation was advanced by the Judiciary Committee to the Senate floor in January, but it has yet to be considered for a vote. While Klobuchar claims she has been working with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and that she has the votes, Schumer said at a private donor event on July 26 that he does not have the votes to get the legislation passed.

The Open App Markets Act is in a similar state. The bill, introduced by Sens. Klobuchar, Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), would attempt to prevent Apple and Google from engaging in “anti-competitive” practices on their mobile app stores. This includes forcing the companies to allow users to download apps from third parties. The bill was advanced by the Judiciary Committee in February and has received a notable amount of attention after Epic Games sued Apple for barring it from selling mobile users its currency without paying Apple its commission.

Another major bill being considered is the American Data Privacy and Protection Act, sponsored by Reps. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), which was advanced by the House Energy Committee on June 20. The legislation would change how companies across multiple industries handle consumer data and preempt most existing state privacy laws.

The House also has several other versions of similar tech legislation, although they have not had any significant developments since their referrals to committees in June 2021. Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) sponsored his own version of AICOA alongside Lance Gooden (R-TX). Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) sponsored the Platform Competition and Opportunity Act alongside Ken Buck (R-CO), which would prohibit dominant platforms from acquiring any businesses that may further expand their market control. The Ending Platform Monopolies Act was sponsored in the House by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) and Gooden and would prohibit companies with multiple “business lines” from referencing their own products. The Augmenting Compatibility and Competition by Enabling Service Switching Act, sponsored by Mary Gay Scanlon (D-PA) and Burgess Owens (R-UT), would attempt to lower barriers to entry by promoting interoperability and data portability requirements. Finally, Joe Negue (D-CO) and Victoria Spartz (R-IN) sponsored the Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act, which would update the fees required for future mergers.

The opportunities for Congress to pass the legislation are “languishing,” according to Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich. While the current Senate will be in place until January 2023, the opportunities for votes will diminish significantly in October due to a large part of Congress campaigning until Election Day in November, Kovacevich said.

Conservative tech experts echoed those notions. “I tend to think that AICOA probably won’t move. But there’s — that’s still up in the air,” Jeffrey Westling, American Action Forum’s director of technology and innovation policy, told the Washington Examiner.


A number of other tech-related bills have been introduced and received attention but have seen little in the way of progression. There is Sara Jacobs’s (D-CA) My Body, My Data Act, which is meant to prevent reproductive health data from being used for prosecutions in places where abortion is criminalized. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act, which would stop law enforcement from purchasing mass amounts of data from brokers. Finally, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) partnered with Wyden and Rep. Doris Matsui (D-CA) to introduce legislation to reintroduce Obama-era net neutrality.

It’s unclear if tech-related issues will become relevant in the 2022 election. While several GOP candidates have run on opposing Big Tech’s censorship of speech, it is unclear how those sorts of issues will compare to economic concerns like inflation. Technology policy was the lowest-ranking issue on voter priorities, according to July polling from the industry group Chamber of Progress.

Related Articles

Back to top button