How Pres­i­dent Trump can save women’s sports on Day 1

The Biden-Har­ris admin­is­tra­tion has done more dam­age to women’s sports and pri­va­cy than you real­ize. On Day 1, Pres­i­dent Joe Biden signed an exec­u­tive order direct­ing the entire gov­ern­ment to infuse gen­der ide­ol­o­gy through­out the nation. “Chil­dren should be able to learn with­out wor­ry­ing about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the lock­er room, or school sports,” he said, which, trans­lat­ed into reg­u­lar Eng­lish, means “Boys, includ­ing 18-year-old seniors, must access girls’ lock­er rooms and sports, if it agrees with their inter­nal sense of self.”  

He direct­ed every agency to imple­ment reg­u­la­tions to car­ry out this pol­i­cy, and they did. Today, schools can­not even qual­i­fy for school lunch mon­ey unless they imple­ment rad­i­cal poli­cies that treat men as women, includ­ing in the lock­er room. (This is all ille­gal, obvi­ous­ly, and court chal­lenges have blunt­ed the effect in some states.) 

Unwind­ing will take some time, and Pres­i­dent-elect Don­ald Trump has com­mit­ted him­self to it. He vowed his admin­is­tra­tion would use Title IX to pro­hib­it men from par­tic­i­pat­ing in women’s sports. That’s a good start. I was an attor­ney for the first Trump White House. I have trav­eled the coun­try with Paula Scan­lan, who was forced to strip before Lia Thomas 18 times per week. I got to know Pay­ton McN­abb who was par­tial­ly par­a­lyzed by a man spik­ing a ball at her head. Here’s my take on what can and should be done imme­di­ate­ly.    

IOC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE CALLS TO PROTECT WOMEN FROM TRANS ATHLETES AS TRUMP PLEDGES BAN BEFORE LA 2028

Dur­ing Trump’s first admin­is­tra­tion, the Depart­ment of Jus­tice found that a Con­necti­cut pol­i­cy per­mit­ting men in women’s sports cuts against Title IX’s core pur­pose, to ensure women have an equal oppor­tu­ni­ty to par­tic­i­pate in edu­ca­tion­al pro­grams, includ­ing sports. 

That was cor­rect, which mul­ti­ple courts have now agreed with when enjoin­ing Biden’s Title IX rewrite (which requires schools to allow men in women’s lock­er rooms). The Supreme Court has indi­cat­ed it unan­i­mous­ly agrees Title IX can­not sus­tain a gen­der ide­ol­o­gy man­date.  

The Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion Office of Civ­il Rights should imme­di­ate­ly announce an inves­ti­ga­tion into a school that fails to pro­tect women’s sports, like San Jose State Uni­ver­si­ty, which con­tin­ues to per­mit a male to take the ros­ter spot of women, endan­ger women dur­ing prac­tices and match­es and silence women from speak­ing out. SJSU is only one option. Sev­er­al schools in New Hamp­shire, for exam­ple, are direct­ly vio­lat­ing their state law that pro­tects women’s sports, claim­ing Biden’s ille­gal Title IX rewrite gives them cov­er.  

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Title IX is a 1972 law designed to stop schools from dis­crim­i­nat­ing against women — dis­crim­i­na­tion that includ­ed offer­ing them zero ath­let­ic oppor­tu­ni­ties, except occa­sion­al­ly field hock­ey. The Biden-Har­ris admin­is­tra­tion seemed to miss that memo, and says Title IX pro­hibits dis­crim­i­na­tion on the basis of “gen­der iden­ti­ty,” in doc­u­ment after doc­u­ment. That argu­ment is ille­gal. The Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion has absolute­ly no statu­to­ry author­i­ty to impose a gen­der ide­ol­o­gy man­date on our nation’s female ath­letes. Delete all this guid­ance.  

My ide­al end solu­tion is to get the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment out of the school busi­ness and return it to the states. But that’s going to take a while. In the mean­time, a new Title IX reg­u­la­tion should explic­it­ly pro­tect women’s sports.

The long­stand­ing reg­u­la­tion says that schools “shall pro­vide equal ath­let­ic oppor­tu­ni­ty for mem­bers of both sex­es.” As if that need­ed clar­i­fi­ca­tion, Trump’s Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion should add that equal oppor­tu­ni­ty requires a rea­son­able num­ber of female-only teams and pri­vate spaces (which is how the statute has been under­stood for decades). And as if that need­ed clar­i­fi­ca­tion, the reg­u­la­tion should define female to mean an indi­vid­ual belong­ing to the sex that has the repro­duc­tive role of pro­duc­ing ova.  

The NCAA is a mul­ti-bil­lion-dol­lar orga­ni­za­tion that strips women of oppor­tu­ni­ties by per­mit­ting post-pubes­cent males in the female cat­e­go­ry. Before sup­port­ing any NCAA wish list items, which might include name-image-like­ness (NIL) leg­is­la­tion, an exemp­tion from Title IX for NIL pay­ments (which go pre­dom­i­nant­ly to men), or breath­ing room from antitrust inves­ti­ga­tion, the NCAA should com­ply with Title IX’s pur­pose of pro­tect­ing women’s sports.  

Three states (Ida­ho, West Vir­ginia and Ari­zona) are cur­rent­ly unable to pro­tect women’s sports due to rogue court inter­pre­ta­tions that the 14th Amend­ment and Title IX require men in women’s sports. Ask the Supreme Court to review and over­turn these unhinged deci­sions. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM MAY MAILMAN