I’m Pres­i­dent Of The Har­vard Repub­li­can Club. Being Repub­li­can At Har­vard Has Nev­er Been Bet­ter.

The orig­i­nal ver­sion of this arti­cle ran in The Har­vard Crim­son on Novem­ber 25, 2024. Pub­lished with per­mis­sion.

* * *

That just 5.2 per­cent of my class at Har­vard admits to being Repub­li­can is no secret — it was the sta­tis­tic pub­lished in The Crimson’s annu­al incom­ing fresh­man sur­vey for the Class of 2025. But the fact that many of the remain­ing 94.8 per­cent active­ly try to ostra­cize and dis­so­ci­ate from con­ser­v­a­tives on cam­pus — while also not a secret — is vast­ly more dis­turb­ing.

In the wake of Pres­i­dent-elect Don­ald Trump’s resound­ing vic­to­ry on Novem­ber 5, stu­dents took to social media plat­forms like Sidechat, an anony­mous social media plat­form, to lam­bast their peers who sim­ply vot­ed for Trump.

“No mat­ter who wins tonight, the fact that so many vote for Trump is f*cking ter­ri­fy­ing,” read one post, which was upvot­ed by 407 Har­vard stu­dents. Oth­er stu­dents called con­ser­v­a­tives at Har­vard “freaks,” “misog­y­nists,” “fas­cists,” and the “stu­pid­est peo­ple on cam­pus.” Some even told them to “unen­roll please, it’s frankly embar­rass­ing.” Most damn­ing was a post which read “Accept the con­se­quences of your beliefs. Want low­er tax­es, take social alien­ation.”

Notwith­stand­ing these pet­ty efforts to under­mine and intim­i­date cam­pus Repub­li­cans into sup­press­ing their view­points, as pres­i­dent of the Har­vard Repub­li­can Club, I can state unequiv­o­cal­ly that it has nev­er been a bet­ter time to be a Repub­li­can on cam­pus.

Since my elec­tion as HRC Pres­i­dent just one year ago, our stu­dent mail­ing list has grown expo­nen­tial­ly from 100 to over 800 — more than 10 per­cent of Harvard’s stu­dent body. We’ve rolled out a career men­tor­ship pro­gram and an Alum­ni Advi­so­ry Board, we’ve sig­nif­i­cant­ly increased the num­ber of events host­ed, and we’ve dra­mat­i­cal­ly increased the aver­age atten­dees at these events over sev­en-fold from less than 20 to almost 150.

This rapid suc­cess is due, in no small part, to the HRC host­ing a wide array of high-pro­file speak­ers who espouse views across the con­ser­v­a­tive ide­o­log­i­cal spec­trum — from busi­ness­men like Pay­Pal co-founder Peter A. Thiel and Palan­tir co-founder Joe Lons­dale to for­mer ambas­sadors like Trevor Traina, think tank lead­ers like Her­itage Foun­da­tion Pres­i­dent Kevin D. Roberts, for­mer gov­er­nors like Asa Hutchin­son, for­mer Sec­re­tary of Home­land Secu­ri­ty Chad F. Wolf, and Cab­i­net nom­i­nee Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ’76.

While I may not agree with every men­tor or speaker’s opin­ion, their diverse per­spec­tives and ideas reflect the broad, open-mind­ed, and wel­com­ing orga­ni­za­tion the HRC has built over the past year.

It was a sim­i­lar­ly broad coali­tion that pro­pelled Trump, whom we proud­ly endorsed in July, to a spec­tac­u­lar­ly deci­sive vic­to­ry — a group of peo­ple with var­ied ideas about America’s future unit­ed behind their Repub­li­can iden­ti­ty.

Of course, the suc­cess of any polit­i­cal move­ment hinges on engag­ing oth­ers who may not agree with a cause, con­vinc­ing them to ulti­mate­ly view it pos­i­tive­ly.

This is par­tic­u­lar­ly true at Har­vard, where some of my peers have like­ly nev­er actu­al­ly engaged with a con­ser­v­a­tive. From their first year on cam­pus, many often self-iso­late into groups that rein­force their opin­ions. These stu­dents’ per­cep­tions of con­ser­v­a­tives are borne exclu­sive­ly from what their media of choice feeds them, and thus our pur­port­ed­ly “edu­cat­ed” stu­dent body blind­ly asso­ciates Repub­li­cans with every neg­a­tive “ism” they have been taught to embrace.

CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE

Over the past year, the HRC has seen a record num­ber of self-iden­ti­fied Democ­rats attend our events and use our resources. We’ve facil­i­tat­ed impor­tant con­ver­sa­tions across par­ty lines (includ­ing a debate between Repub­li­cans and Democ­rats at Vis­i­tas) and brought a diverse set of per­spec­tives to those who sought them out.

Our suc­cess — like the nation­al Repub­li­can Party’s suc­cess — is con­tin­gent on a diverse coali­tion only pos­si­ble when we embrace het­eroge­nous opin­ions and allow for robust con­ver­sa­tions. Just look at Trump’s new Cab­i­net: It includes many for­mer Democ­rats, includ­ing Kennedy and Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Tul­si Gab­bard (D‑Hawaii). Those sur­prised by Trump’s vic­to­ry ear­li­er this month might assume that Repub­li­can life at Har­vard is dead. But that couldn’t be fur­ther from the truth.

Our events are more than well attend­ed, our speak­ers top-tier, and our ener­gy through the roof. And per­haps most impor­tant­ly, many Repub­li­cans are will­ing to open­ly embrace their val­ues on cam­pus, despite the afore­men­tioned social media posts.

I encour­age those inter­est­ed in step­ping out of their com­fort zone and chal­leng­ing their pre­con­ceived notions about con­ser­v­a­tives to take advan­tage of the move­ment we’ve built. Instead of attempts at name-call­ing, intim­i­da­tion, and ostra­ciza­tion, seek out Repub­li­cans. Lis­ten to what they believe. Heck, even argue with them if you want. But at least engage with their ideas on a mean­ing­ful lev­el. You might just learn some­thing.

* * *

Michael Oved ’25, an Eco­nom­ics con­cen­tra­tor in Adams house, is pres­i­dent of the Har­vard Repub­li­can Club, and chair of the Con­ser­v­a­tive Coali­tion at the Insti­tute of Pol­i­tics.

The orig­i­nal ver­sion of this arti­cle ran in The Har­vard Crim­son on Novem­ber 25, 2024. Pub­lished with per­mis­sion.

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not nec­es­sar­i­ly rep­re­sent those of The Dai­ly Wire.