Despite U.S. Aid, Somalia’s Gov­ern­ment Is as Weak as Ever

Despite U.S. Aid, Somalia’s Government Is as Weak as Ever

Despite U.S. Aid, Somalia’s Gov­ern­ment Is as Weak as Ever

Al-Shabaab has begun to encir­cle the cap­i­tal.

Mogadishu,somalia,-,Sep,30,,2014,:,View,Of,Mogadishu,,Mogadishu

Since Feb­ru­ary, the ter­ror­ist group al-Shabaab has been on the offen­sive in Soma­lia, with many fear­ing that they aim to take Mogadishu, the cap­i­tal. Fol­low­ing a 2022 gov­ern­ment offen­sive in the mid­dle part of the coun­try, the sit­u­a­tion sta­bi­lized and the group was believed to be great­ly weakened—but not for long. 

In the time since, the gov­ern­ment has become involved in sig­nif­i­cant dis­putes about chang­ing the con­sti­tu­tion. The con­tro­ver­sies have led to a falling out between Mogadishu and the region­al gov­ern­ments of Punt­land in the north and Juba­land in the south, leav­ing the Soma­li Nation­al Army and allied mili­tias with­out sup­port from the armed forces of key regions. Al-Shabaab has cap­tured sig­nif­i­cant ter­ri­to­ry since the ongo­ing offen­sive began, though no one can agree on how much and they have moved in and out of many ter­ri­to­ries with­out attempt­ing to hold them. 

Last month al-Shabaab attacked Pres­i­dent Has­san Sheikh Mohamud’s con­voy with­in a mile of Vil­la Soma­lia, the pres­i­den­tial palace. The onslaught killed four, though the pres­i­dent him­self escaped unscathed.

Mean­while, the U.S., Europe, and their African part­ners seem to be tir­ing of their com­mit­ment to the per­pet­u­al­ly trou­bled state and may let Turkey take over. If that hap­pens, Ankara would become the lat­est in the mer­ry-go-round of for­eign occu­piers in Soma­lia.

The ori­gins of Al-Shabaab, Somalia’s Al Qae­da affil­i­ate, date back around 20 years. Fol­low­ing the fall in 1991 of the Barre gov­ern­ment, Islamists filled the pow­er vac­u­um and began to bring order to the coun­try, set­ting up Sharia courts and pro­mot­ing an ide­ol­o­gy that many young men found attrac­tive. They con­sol­i­dat­ed pow­er in 2006 after chas­ing the “war­lord” coali­tion out of Mogadishu. 

How­ev­er, Ethiopia invad­ed short­ly there­after, backed by the Unit­ed States, and threw the Islam­ic Courts Union out of pow­er. Ethiopia occu­pied the coun­try for three years, estab­lish­ing the Tran­si­tion­al Fed­er­al Gov­ern­ment, which became the Fed­er­al Gov­ern­ment of Soma­lia, such as it is, that we have today. Al-Shabaab, which means “the youth” in Ara­bic, was a youth mili­tia of the Islam­ic Courts Union which took a lead­ing role in the insur­gency against Ethiopia and its tran­si­tion­al gov­ern­ment, ulti­mate­ly pledg­ing loy­al­ty to Al Qae­da in 2012.

Soma­lia fell into the pat­tern of weak states that are inter­na­tion­al wards, sim­i­lar to Afghanistan. The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has main­tained lim­it­ed con­trol, most­ly in the cap­i­tal, while the state is seri­ous­ly chal­lenged by ter­ror­ists who hold a large amount of ter­ri­to­ry. 

It is hard to know how many dol­lars in U.S. aid Soma­lia has received, but accord­ing to Elias Yousif of the Stim­son Cen­ter, in the 2010s it was around $3 bil­lion: $2.5 bil­lion to the African Union Mis­sion in Soma­lia and $500 mil­lion direct­ly to the nation­al army. A 2019 Wash­ing­ton Post arti­cle states that in the pre­ced­ing year Soma­lia received $441 mil­lion from USAID as its stan­dard aid pack­age. 

Soma­lia is com­mon­ly rat­ed the world’s most cor­rupt coun­try by Trans­paren­cy Inter­na­tion­al, though South Sudan over­took it in the 2024 index. The Amer­i­can tax­pay­er would not be pleased to learn about the nature of U.S. aid to Soma­lia. Var­i­ous fund­ing pro­grams have been repeat­ed­ly stopped and restart­ed over cor­rup­tion con­cerns. More­over, by some accounts over a third of Somalia’s leg­is­la­tors are dual cit­i­zens, many less inter­est­ed in gov­ern­ing than keep­ing mon­ey flow­ing from their sec­ond coun­try, who come back to Soma­lia for “tours” in par­lia­ment, the way some­one else might go to Africa for human­i­tar­i­an work.

Obvi­ous­ly, for­eign aid hasn’t bought a sta­ble gov­ern­ment in Mogadishu, much less one which has ever come close to con­trol­ling all of inter­na­tion­al­ly rec­og­nized Soma­lia. How­ev­er, that isn’t to say there have been no improve­ments, and Soma­lia has had some­thing resem­bling a real gov­ern­ment for over a decade. But Somalia’s infa­mous clan sys­tem has made democ­ra­cy dif­fi­cult. By African stan­dards, the coun­try is remark­ably uni­form in terms of nation­al­i­ty, lan­guage, and reli­gion. Still, the gov­ern­ment had to adopt some­thing sim­i­lar to Lebanon’s sec­tar­i­an con­sti­tu­tion, dis­trib­ut­ing polit­i­cal pow­er between the clans. 

Mohamud has been try­ing to push through a reformed con­sti­tu­tion and “one per­son, one vote” elec­tions since com­ing to pow­er, a source of end­less strife with­in the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. In response to Mohamud’s efforts, Punt­land, which uni­lat­er­al­ly declared inter­nal auton­o­my in the ‘90s, with­drew recog­ni­tion from the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. Mean­while, Juba­land changed its con­sti­tu­tion, in vio­la­tion of fed­er­al law, to allow its region­al pres­i­dent to be elect­ed to a third term, lead­ing to a dis­pute that also saw Juba­land break off rela­tions with the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. The lat­ter devel­op­ment sparked at least one gun bat­tle in which the nation­al army came off worse than Juba­land forces.

Despite all of these prob­lems, the Soma­li Nation­al Army and “local mili­tias” known as Macaw­isleey start­ed a rea­son­ably suc­cess­ful offen­sive against Al-Shabaab. Backed by U.S. airstrikes, it went well for a while, and the gov­ern­ment con­tin­ued to report as late Feb­ru­ary that Al-Shabaab was on its last legs. How­ev­er, the tide turned, and Soma­lia began to lose vil­lages to the ter­ror­ist group, which also besieged a hotel that was hold­ing a meet­ing on counter-ter­ror strat­e­gy. The mil­i­tants have tak­en sev­er­al vil­lages and cities in the cen­tral Sha­belle region, though peo­ple dis­agree on how many, in a counter-offen­sive seen by many as an effort to sur­round Mogadishu. The brazen attack on the president’s con­voy demon­strat­ed mil­i­tary capac­i­ty and an abil­i­ty to oper­ate in the imme­di­ate vicin­i­ty of ter­ri­to­ry con­trolled by the Mogadishu gov­ern­ment.

There is cur­rent­ly no way to know if Mogadishu will hold, and ana­lysts dis­agree on the extent of the threat. Matt Bry­den at Sahan Research Group, which is gen­er­al­ly seen as fair­ly favor­able to West­ern gov­ern­ments and crit­i­cal of Mogadishu, said “there’s a chance of al-Shabaab ful­ly encir­cling or pos­si­bly even at one stage over­run­ning the city,” while Omar Mah­mood of the Inter­na­tion­al Cri­sis Group doubt­ed that Al-Shaabab would march to the cap­i­tal. 

Bryden’s analy­sis is prov­ing more accu­rate. Al-Shabaab indeed has marched towards Mogadishu—by some reports reach­ing with­in 20 kilo­me­ters of the city—and the sit­u­a­tion has grown des­per­ate enough that the Soma­li gov­ern­ment has deployed untrained prison guards to fight them. In a BBC inter­view, Bry­den spec­u­lat­ed that Al-Shabaab aims for a psy­cho­log­i­cal blow by con­vinc­ing the pop­u­lace Mogadishu could fall. But the group may not want to achieve much beyond that—yet. Bry­den not­ed that Al-Shabaab col­lects enor­mous tax rev­enue, per­haps $100 mil­lion annu­al­ly or more, and thus ben­e­fits from the con­tin­u­a­tion of some sem­blance of polit­i­cal sta­bil­i­ty. But as the gov­ern­ment grows weak­er and Al-Shabaab stronger, the lat­ter may soon decide it’s time to strike. As explained by secu­ri­ty ana­lyst Adam Duad Ahmed in a recent op-ed, Al-Shabaab has devel­oped par­al­lel gov­er­nance struc­tures across Soma­lia, some­thing that the Mogadishu government’s boost­ers down­play at their own per­il, as this means they may be ready to rule Soma­lia, just as jihadists took over Dam­as­cus last Decem­ber and became the Syr­i­an state.

Across Somalia’s ever-divid­ed polit­i­cal spec­trum, there were calls for Mohamud to unite the clans to pro­tect the cap­i­tal and turn back the tide. Ini­tial­ly, he seemed reluc­tant to do so, but at the end of March he relent­ed, announc­ing the inten­tion to hold a con­fer­ence and seem­ing­ly giv­ing up on his divi­sive con­sti­tu­tion­al reforms. Mohamud is also work­ing hard to bring yet more for­eign troops to Soma­lia, and he seems to be near­ing a defense agree­ment with Turkey. On the oth­er hand, he made the bizarre move of offer­ing the U.S. con­trol of ports in Punt­land and Soma­liland—nei­ther of which Mogadishu controls—in hopes of avert­ing pos­si­ble U.S. recog­ni­tion of the inde­pen­dence of Soma­liland, a de fac­to state that is cur­rent­ly rec­og­nized as part of Soma­lia under inter­na­tion­al law. Mohamud’s action seems to demon­strate that he remains too focused on infight­ing to con­front the immi­nent threat to Mogadishu. 

While the sit­u­a­tion remains flu­id, one thing is clear: After decades of inter­na­tion­al finan­cial and mil­i­tary sup­port, the Mogadishu gov­ern­ment is no clos­er to assert­ing con­trol over a uni­fied Soma­lia.

The post Despite U.S. Aid, Somalia’s Gov­ern­ment Is as Weak as Ever appeared first on The Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive.